BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF Overtakes Gold ETF in Assets Amid Bitcoin Surge
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) surpasses the iShares Gold Trust in net assets, marking a shift in investor preference amidst a strong bitcoin rally and increased inflows.
Author: Tanishq Bodh
Written On: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 14:29:23 GMT
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has recently outpaced its iShares Gold Trust (IAU) in total assets, marking a significant milestone for the asset management giant. According to data shared by BlackRock, IBIT, which launched earlier this year, now holds $33.2 billion in net assets, slightly more than the $32 billion held by the IAU, BlackRock’s gold ETF established in 2005.
The rapid growth of IBIT underscores a shift in investor interest, especially following a rally in bitcoin. BlackRock data indicates that IBIT’s surge in assets was accelerated by both bitcoin’s year-to-date price gains of approximately 80% and fresh inflows sparked by Donald Trump’s recent election victory.
While gold has also performed well this year, its growth has been outpaced by bitcoin’s performance. Industry analysts note that the record inflows to bitcoin ETFs, which reached $1.3 billion on Thursday alone, saw BlackRock’s IBIT account for an unprecedented $1.1 billion of that total, according to Farside Investors.
As IBIT gains momentum, experts highlight the fund’s rapid growth as a key indicator of changing trends in asset allocation. However, IBIT still trails behind the largest gold ETF, SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), which holds $76 billion.
The rising asset values in BlackRock’s IBIT suggest a shifting landscape as digital assets increasingly attract investor capital once reserved for traditional assets like gold.
Trusted
Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.