Loading Search...
A public between Vitalik Buterin and Anatoly Yakovenko has reignited discussions around the security of Ethereum’s layer-2 networks.
Author: Sahil Thakur
27th October 2025 – A public debate between Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has reignited discussions around the security of Ethereum’s layer-2 (L2) networks. Their opposing viewpoints have raised questions about whether L2 solutions genuinely inherit the robust security guarantees of Ethereum’s base layer.
In a recent post on X, Vitalik Buterin defended Ethereum’s L2 security model. He argued that major L2 networks—such as Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Worldchain – derive finality and resistance to 51% attacks directly from Ethereum’s base layer.
“A key property of a blockchain is that even a 51% attack cannot make an invalid block valid,” Buterin wrote. “This means even 51% of validators colluding (or hit by a software bug) cannot steal your assets.”
However, he also pointed out the limits of that security. If validator sets are entrusted with tasks that the chain itself does not control, those guarantees may break down.
“At that point, 51% of validators can collude and give a wrong answer, and you don’t have any recourse,” he added.
Proponents of Ethereum’s L2 architecture highlight the strength of its validator base, which includes over one million active participants, vastly outnumbering Solana’s approximately 2,000 validators. This validator scale, they argue, increases resistance to coordinated attacks.
Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko directly disputed Buterin’s claims. In his view, the belief that Ethereum L2s inherit full security from the base chain is incorrect.
“The claim that L2s inherit Ethereum security is erroneous,” Yakovenko posted on X. “Five years into the L2 roadmap, wormhole ETH on Solana has the same worst-case risks as ETH on Base – and generates as much revenue for Ethereum L1 stakers.”
Yakovenko questioned whether persistent limitations stem from fundamental issues with L2 design. He dismissed the notion that delays in achieving full security are due to incompetence among L2 teams.
He outlined three major vulnerabilities:
To address these concerns, Yakovenko proposed building a dedicated Ethereum-Solana bridge that positions Ethereum as a layer-2 on Solana. He believes such a solution could enable secure asset transfers between the ecosystems while avoiding current L2 shortcomings.
As Ethereum and Solana continue to scale, their respective strategies for decentralization, security, and interoperability are becoming increasingly divergent, setting the stage for ongoing debate within the blockchain community.
Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.
