Loading Ratings...
$PENGUIN CTO Hijack Allegations spark backlash as Pump.fun faces claims the original rugger regained control after a community revival.
Author: Akshat Thakur
Published On: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 16:21:32 GMT
January 24, 2026 — $PENGUIN CTO Hijack Allegations have erupted across Crypto Twitter after traders accused Pump.fun of enabling an apparent control takeover tied to the meme coin’s original deployer. The controversy matters because it undermines one of the strongest “community revival” narratives on Solana, raising fresh concerns about governance integrity, fee rights, and platform accountability in the Pump.fun ecosystem.
High Signal Summary For A Quick Glance
Pump.fun has become Solana’s dominant meme coin launchpad due to its extremely low barrier to token creation. While that openness fuels viral launches, it also attracts repeat scammers, rug pull behavior, and a constant churn of tokens with little long-term structure.
To address abandoned projects, the culture around “CTO” short for Community Takeover, emerged as a way for holders to salvage rugged tokens. In theory, CTO control enables community leaders to coordinate marketing, manage social channels, and sometimes claim platform-linked revenue streams tied to the token’s activity.
This is why CTO designation carries major implications. Whoever holds the CTO slot can gain legitimacy and, in some cases, benefit financially from fees or related privileges. As a result, CTO decisions often become the most contested governance flashpoint in any revived meme coin.
$PENGUIN (CA: 5i5WNHo9kkE2PBK8h66yFo4wTBy61z3aa3njCTgxBAGS) launched in 2025 and was widely described as rugged early in its lifecycle. The deployer, known as BastilleBTC, allegedly dumped holdings and vanished, leaving the token effectively abandoned.
However, unlike typical rugs that die permanently, $PENGUIN became a rare success story of community-led resurrection. Traders and meme accounts rallied around the token, pushing it organically through social momentum. The narrative attracted attention because it represented the kind of chaotic-but-authentic meme coin miracle Solana traders celebrate: a coin surviving without a developer.
By early January 2026, the community-driven rebound reportedly drove $PENGUIN’s market cap to tens of millions, turning the token into a headline example of how meme culture can override a failed launch.
Key milestones in the $PENGUIN CTO hijack controversy
$PENGUIN launches on Pump.fun but is quickly rugged by deployer BastilleBTC, who dumps holdings and abandons the project.
A 0.2 SOL transfer from BastilleBTC’s wallet to the deployer address is cited as evidence linking the wallets on-chain.
The community starts an organic revival, marketing the token and building a holder base without the original developer.
$PENGUIN surges above a $70M market cap amid viral hype and a “PvE” narrative gaining traction on Crypto X.
@CatDevSupreme posts a viral thread claiming the CTO assignment was moved back to the original rugger, sparking outrage and renewed scrutiny on Pump.fun.
The $PENGUIN surge reportedly coincided with the viral spread of the “Nihilist Penguin” trend online, rooted in a clip from Werner Herzog’s documentary Encounters at the End of the World. The meme, featuring a lone penguin walking away from its colony toward inhospitable terrain, became symbolic of ironic despair and existential defiance.
Crypto communities quickly tied that theme to market behavior. They described abandoning the “herd,” embracing chaos, and pushing a meme coin through sheer social force.
As the meme spread across X, TikTok, Reddit, and Instagram, it may have amplified attention on the token creating a powerful loop of memes → buys → more memes → higher market cap. Some posts even suggested that political and mainstream amplification boosted visibility further, accelerating inflows.
The core controversy centers on the project’s CTO position. Critics claim it and its benefits were reassigned to a wallet allegedly linked to BastilleBTC.
The $PENGUIN CTO Hijack Allegations gained traction after X user @CatDevSupreme published a viral thread presenting what they argued was on-chain proof connecting the alleged “new” CTO wallet to the original deployer. The centerpiece was a reported transaction: a 0.2 SOL transfer from BastilleBTC’s known wallet to the deployer wallet dated August 30, 2025.
Critics say this may indicate that the alleged rugger returned under a new identity. They argue the individual reclaimed CTO status to extract value through control, fees, and platform legitimacy, not supply dumping.
Multiple community members framed the situation as a betrayal of the revival. They argued the community rebuilt the token, only for the original deployer to benefit afterward.
Src: @CatDevSupreme
The anger has not only targeted the alleged deployer. Much of the backlash has focused on Pump.fun. Critics claim platform admins either knowingly approved the reassignment or failed basic verification checks.
Several replies accused Pump.fun accounts and moderators of favoritism. Some also alleged that the internal handling of CTO ownership is opaque or discretionary. Other users suggested there were competing applicants for CTO status. They claim those applicants were sidelined, while a wallet allegedly linked to the original deployer received the role.
As the thread spread, it sparked a broader debate about whether Pump.fun has safeguards to stop known ruggers from returning. The concern is greater once a token gains traction and becomes economically meaningful again.
Real voices. Real reactions.
@CatDevSupreme @Nietzscheanpeng Been saying this for months. Every cto runs through pumpfun first. They have eyes on everything. They are the mafia.
@CatDevSupreme @Nietzscheanpeng this is insane.
@CatDevSupreme @Nietzscheanpeng Bastille owns 2% still. Line is going up. Who cares about fees
Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.
