Oct Logo
Search Icon
Oct Logo
Search Icon
Loading Ratings...
Genesis Lawsuit Alleges DCG ‘Alter Ego’ Scheme and Ignored Risk Warnings

Genesis Lawsuit Alleges DCG ‘Alter Ego’ Scheme and Ignored Risk Warnings

Genesis lawsuit claims DCG ignored audit warnings and used Genesis as an “alter ego” while mismanaging billions in crypto loans.

Image of Akshat ThakurAkshat ThakurNews

Jun 25, 2025

Written By Akshat Thakur

Author: Akshat Thakur

Written On: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:13:50 GMT

A newly unsealed complaint accuses DCG of knowingly exposing Genesis to collapse, despite early warnings and audit red flags.

A confidential memo from Digital Currency Group (DCG)’s CFO Michael Kraines, revealed in a newly unsealed court complaint, warned that Genesis’s collapse could trigger legal consequences for DCG. The memo, addressed to former Genesis CEO Michael Moro, explicitly considered if Genesis could be deemed DCG’s “alter ego” in future litigation.

Kraines’s internal “war-gaming exercise” anticipated the very claims now central to Genesis’s legal filing. The memo outlined a scenario where Genesis’s downfall might threaten DCG’s financial stability and shareholder confidence long before the firm’s actual bankruptcy filing.

DCG Ignored Multiple Risk Warnings

According to the Delaware Court of Chancery filing, DCG received numerous warnings from external consultants and auditors as Genesis expanded its loan book from $4 billion to $12 billion. Despite identifying “material weaknesses” in financial oversight as early as 2020, DCG delayed acting.

A risk committee created to mitigate systemic contagion only met nine months after being approved. Kraines reportedly joked that the delay would “make my future deposition easier,” suggesting awareness of possible legal exposure.

Auditors also criticized Genesis for lacking robust controls, describing the company as “flying blind.” Meanwhile, internal communication revealed Genesis employees felt pressure to serve DCG’s agenda rather than exercise sound risk governance.

Toxic Culture and Misuse of Funds

The complaint paints a grim picture of workplace culture, claiming DCG kept Genesis afloat solely to extract funds and maintain a façade of financial stability. Employees described the environment as a “culture of submission,” and alleged they were directed to promote misleading narratives during the 3AC fallout.

Genesis claims DCG orchestrated deals—including a controversial $1.1 billion promissory note and a September 2022 “roundtrip” transaction to obscure its growing insolvency and mislead creditors.

What Has Happened So Far

  • 2020: External audits flag major financial control issues within Genesis.
  • June 2022: DCG issues a $1.1 billion promissory note following the 3AC collapse.
  • September 2022: DCG and Genesis engage in a roundtrip transaction to mask liquidity problems.
  • Early 2023: Genesis files for bankruptcy amid mounting debt obligations.
  • June 2025: Unsealed lawsuit reveals internal memos and details a $3.3B recovery claim against DCG and Barry Silbert.

Conclusion

The unsealed Genesis lawsuit outlines a serious case of financial mismanagement and potential corporate deception. With over $3.3 billion at stake, the outcome could reshape how accountability is enforced in crypto conglomerates. As legal proceedings unfold, the crypto community and creditors await further clarity on the extent of DCG’s role in Genesis’s collapse.

The Talk

Real voices. Real reactions.

Add your reaction to this story:

Trusted

Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.

Hero Image
Share with your community!
FacebookXLinkedIn
Hero Image
Share with your community!
FacebookXLinkedIn

Related reads