Consensys challenges SEC charges, claiming the SEC lacks authority to regulate Metamask. This case could impact the future of web3.
Author: Tanishq Bodh
Written On: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 21:17:22 GMT
Consensys Software has issued a statement addressing U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charges accusing the company of unregistered securities offerings through Metamask staking and swaps. Consensys contends the SEC’s actions are regulatory overreach and vows to defend its position in court, emphasizing the broader implications for the web3 ecosystem.
On Friday, Consensys Software issued a statement about the charges brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC accused Consensys of “engaging in the unregistered offer and sale of securities through a service it calls Metamask Staking and with operating as an unregistered broker through Metamask Staking and another service it calls Metamask Swaps.”
Consensys stated they “fully expected the SEC to follow through on its threat to claim our Metamask software interface must register as a securities broker.” Furthermore, they added, “The SEC has been pursuing an anti-crypto agenda led by ad hoc enforcement action. This is just the latest example of its regulatory overreach – a transparent attempt to redefine well-established legal standards and expand the SEC’s jurisdiction via lawsuit.”
Consensys continued, “We are confident the SEC has not been granted authority to regulate software interfaces like Metamask. Therefore, we will continue to vigorously pursue our case in Texas for a ruling on these issues. This matters not only to our company but to the future success of web3.”
In April, Consensys filed a lawsuit against the SEC to protect the Ethereum ecosystem. They argued that the SEC’s attempt to regulate ether (ETH) as a security would significantly impact the U.S.’s ability to use Ethereum and related blockchain technologies. The company stressed, “The implications would stretch far beyond digital asset trading. They would jeopardize the future of countless new innovations, products, and U.S. jobs that this next generation of the Internet will unleash.”
Last week, Consensys announced the SEC had concluded its investigation into Ethereum 2.0 without taking any enforcement action. The company described this outcome as “a major win for Ethereum developers, technology providers, and industry participants who have suffered as a result of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulatory overreach and inconsistent positions on Ethereum.”
Do you think Consensys will win against the SEC in court? Let us know in the comments section below.
Our Crypto Talk is committed to unbiased, transparent, and true reporting to the best of our knowledge. This news article aims to provide accurate information in a timely manner. However, we advise the readers to verify facts independently and consult a professional before making any decisions based on the content since our sources could be wrong too. Check our Terms and conditions for more info.
Consensys Challenges SEC Charges
Consensys Responds to SEC Allegations
Confident in Their Position
Previous Legal Actions
SEC Investigation Outcome
Frictionless Deploys Private OTC Controller on Ethereum, Announces Soft Launch
Layer AI Surges Over 100% Ahead of Uphold Fiat Exchange Listing
Tectum and PropChain Partner to Expand Real-World Asset Tokenization
LIBRA Pump-and-Dump Allegations Intensify as Argentina Requests Interpol Action
Frictionless Deploys Private OTC Controller on Ethereum, Announces Soft Launch
Layer AI Surges Over 100% Ahead of Uphold Fiat Exchange Listing
Tectum and PropChain Partner to Expand Real-World Asset Tokenization
LIBRA Pump-and-Dump Allegations Intensify as Argentina Requests Interpol Action