In August Qubic shook the crypto world. From claiming 51% of Monero’s hashrate to launching its own high-speed compute network. Is this innovation or chaos in disguise?
Qubic is a revolutionary Layer-1 blockchain platform designed to merge AI with decentralized computing, aiming to create the world’s first decentralized supercomputer capable of achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) by 2027. The biggest strength of $QUBIC has been its community that has been bullish and behind the team at all times.
In this article, we’ll break down the community’s reactions like what excites them, what frustrates them, and how they handle both wins and setbacks.
Why Did We Choose Qubic ?
Strong and a vocal community
The $QUBIC community shines as the strongest in crypto, with 376K engagements in one month
Vocal and decisive, $QUBIC holders voted on Discord to redirect mining hashpower from Monero
Founder Sergey Ivancheglo (aka Come-from-Beyond) is actively engaging with the community
Positive Events in the Qubic Community
Useful Proof-of-Work (uPoW) Milestone – General 2025
Qubic introduced a groundbreaking “Useful Proof-of-Work” (uPoW) system where mining directly powers real AI training, aiming to achieve AGI by 2027. CertiK verified Qubic’s performance at 15.5 million TPS with a 91.40 audit score, positioning it as a leader in AI-blockchain integration.
Community’s Reaction The community celebrated this as one of Qubic’s biggest validations. Users praised the combination of blockchain and AI utility rather than pure speculation.
Decentralized Supercomputer Achievement – July 2025
Qubic became the 6th largest decentralized supercomputer worldwide, unveiling its Intelligent Tissue architecture for smart contracts and AGI evolution. The Aigarth framework went live, enabling self-improving AI to run on Qubic’s distributed network, a massive leap in decentralized intelligence.
Community’s Reaction Community sentiment turned euphoric as members realized Qubic’s ambition extended beyond crypto toward building a thinking network.
Negative Events in the Qubic Community
Dogecoin Hashpower Redirect Controversy – August 2025
A community vote redirected part of Qubic’s mining hashpower to Dogecoin, unintentionally triggering a 5% DOGE price drop and sparking backlash over ethics and network manipulation. The move showcased Qubic’s computational dominance but also raised concerns about responsibility and decentralization.
Community’s Reaction Critics viewed the event as reckless, while Qubic supporters framed it as an experimental show of strength.
Founder History and Trust Issues – July 2024
Past controversies surrounding founder Sergey Ivancheglo (CFB) resurfaced, referencing his involvement in failed or disputed projects like NXT, IOTA, and Jinn. Accusations of unprofessional behavior, vague communication, and delayed whitepapers led to renewed community skepticism.
Community’s Reaction Mixed emotions across social channels, long-term fans defended his innovation record, while others questioned leadership stability.
It has 37/1000 TwitterScore which is considered normal.
QUBIC ($QUBIC) maintained strong visibility on X, driven by active community engagement. Key topics included ecosystem expansions (NFT marketplace QubicBay, Solana bridge, DeFi tools), event participation (MERGE Madrid, TOKEN2049, Shanghai Blockchain Week), mining profitability and token burns, AI advancements (Aigarth Ternary Paradox), and speculation around Tier-1 exchange listings (OKX, Binance).
Sentiment
Over 90% bullish, driven by AGI vision, token burns (23T+ $QUBIC), and listing anticipationMinor skepticism on campaign delays (e.g., OKX registration shortfalls), offset by confidence in technology
Reactions focused on “diamond hands,” “1000x potential,” and comparisons to $TAO/$XMR
Bullish periods amplified FOMO; bearish dips prompted “buy the dip” discussions.
Telegram
Qubic Telegram community hosts over 21,000 members, serving as the main hub for project discussions, updates, and community engagement.
Strong Visibility:Qubic maintains active presence across X and Telegram, sharing updates on ecosystem expansions, events, mining, AI developments, and listing speculation.
Announcements & Updates: Frequent official posts cover technical achievements, ecosystem launches (QubicBay NFT marketplace, Solana bridge), major events (MERGE Madrid, TOKEN2049, Shanghai Blockchain Week), mining summaries, voting, and AMAs.
Engagement & Sentiment: High engagement on official posts (200–600 likes), with community largely bullish (91%+ sentiment). Members show resilience during price dips and participate actively in discussions, proposal votes, and ecosystem support.
Trading Activity: Active discussions on short-term price movements, volume, and listings; tone oscillates between optimism and frustration. Retail traders frequently speculate on catalysts and market trends.
Mining & Technical Support: Practical, community-driven support with wallet recovery guidance, troubleshooting, and reward campaigns. Discussions focus on participation, mining profitability, and technical processes rather than casual chat.
Weekly & Summary Updates: Structured recaps emphasize achievements, research progress, and ecosystem growth. Official posts remain one-way, closed to member replies for clarity and consistency.
Engage & FAQ: Limited activity; updates mainly promotional or informational. FAQs serve as static reference for wallet setup, node types, tokenomics, and protocol mechanics; no recent activity in the past year.
Discord
Activity focused on transparency, funding proposals, AMAs, and ecosystem updates, aligning with Qubic’s grassroots ethos. Key drivers included events like TOKEN2049, MERGE Madrid, and weekly stages.
Analysis of Community Reactions
Positive Reactions (80-90% of Mentions): Focused on tech and growth (e.g., burns, mining, AGI). Users praised “vibrant community” and “transparency” in stages/AMAs. Events like TOKEN2049 sparked “global takeover” excitement. Bullish during recoveries (e.g., +9% MC): “Diamond hands win,” “scarcity incoming.”
Negative Reactions (10-20% of Mentions): Centered on moderation (e.g., 7-day timeout seen as “injustice,” bias toward certain members). Some criticized CFB’s responses or delays (e.g., OKX not hitting targets). “Unofficial” Discord praised for nuance but noted as a ban refuge.
Bullish vs. Bearish Periods: During price dips (mid-Sep), reactions were resilient (“buy opportunities”). Recoveries (early Oct) amplified FOMO (“ignition phase”)
Overall Insights: Discord is a core engagement tool, but X amplifies reactions. Community is passionate and tech-focused, with growth potential if moderation issues are addressed. Compared to peers, Qubic’s activity rivals $TAO but at a fraction of MC.
FOMO Fueled Growth, FUD Tested Strength
Engagement at Project Start (Early 2024: Launch & Initial Hype)
Trader & Fan Activity:Excitement around fair launch (no presale/VCs). Comparisons to $KAS and $TAO; focus on uPoW, AGI potential, 40M+ TPS. Active buying: “Just bought another $1,000,” small exchange listings, gem lists. Fans hyped founder CFB’s history (IOTA ties), DEX/game launches.
Community Reactions:Overwhelmingly positive & speculative. Phrases like “don’t miss $QUBIC,” “disruptive technology,” “first game/DEX launch.” High FOMO; users retweeting to affirm potential.
Trader & Fan Activity:Focus on long-term vision: AGI by 2027, mining ($XMR/$DOGE), Tier-1 listing rumors (OKX/Binance), burns, hackathons, events (Token2049). Traders discuss charts (“ready to pump”), buybacks, diamond hands. Fans share team updates, monthly milestones, memes.
Community Reactions:Optimistic, patient, milestone-focused. Sentiment remains high: 91.6% bullish. Common phrases: “big brewing,” “patience is key,” “domination feeling.” Memes and pride in events replace launch-phase FOMO.
Market & Mood: How Traders and Fans Are Engaging
Community & Google Trend Highlights
Market Cap and Ecosystem AssessmentClaim: “Qubic may have a smaller market cap (~$200M) and fewer ecosystem dApps…”Analysis: Accurate. Qubic’s market cap is ~$200–300M (price ~$0.00000166), below AI-blockchain peers like Bittensor ($TAO, ~$3.5B) or Fetch.ai ($FET, ~$1.4B).
Technical StrengthsClaim: “…but it stands out with ultra-high-speed performance (15.5M TPS), uPoW mining that directly contributes to AI training, feeless transactions…”Analysis: Highly accurate. 15.5M TPS is CertiK-verified (score 91.4), enabling instant finality.
Community EngagementClaim: “…and a highly engaged grassroots community (60K Discord members). The community is active, mission-driven, and focused on the project’s AGI ambitions rather than short-term price swings.”Analysis: Mostly accurate. Discord ~60K members (4K+ daily active), with weekly stages, AMAs, and proposal votes.
Google Trends ComponentClaim: Implies trend highlights.Analysis: Inaccurate. No specific trends data provided. Qubic shows low search volume compared to TAO or FET.
Overall Evaluation
Strengths: Accurate on market cap, tech, and community; emphasizes Qubic’s innovation and engaged grassroots.
Weaknesses: Misleading Google Trends header; adoption metrics limited.
Rating: 7/10, strong on community and tech facts (~90% accurate), deducts for trend misrepresentation.
Comparing Communities: What Makes Qubic Stand Out
Compared to peers like Bittensor, Fetch.ai, Render Network, and SingularityNET, Qubic’s strength lies in raw compute power, scalability, and community-driven growth, while these competitors generally excel in niche areas such as specialized AI subnets, agent-based automation, GPU rendering, or R&D.
However, they often have larger market caps, more formal or fragmented communities, and alliances that provide stability but can limit creativity and direct engagement.
Qubic may have a smaller market cap (~$200M) and fewer ecosystem dApps, but it stands out with ultra-high-speed performance (15.5M TPS), uPoW mining that directly contributes to AI training, feeless transactions, and a highly engaged grassroots community (60K Discord members). The community is active, mission-driven, and focused on the project’s AGI ambitions rather than short-term price swings.
Overall, Qubic demonstrates that a smaller, mission-focused project with innovative technology and an active community can punch above its weight, offering a more organic, utility-driven ecosystem compared to larger, more established AI-blockchain networks.
Overall Takeaways
Positive for Qubic: High TPS, innovative uPoW turning mining into productive AI compute, feeless transactions, strong grassroots community, potential for AGI leadership.
Negative for Qubic: Smaller ecosystem, limited dApps, founder/trust concerns, fewer Tier-1 listings, higher exposure to adoption and regulatory risks.
